Freemasonry and Intellectual Property
March 18, 2011
Some forms of freemasonry build an environment for a client so that that client may reach some insight. There is nothing wrong with that, as long as the client is informed and consents.
Unfortunately, there are conflicts of interests. There may be freemasons in intelligence services who abuse their access by illicitly taking ideas protected by intellectual property laws through espionage services and then build an environment to induce that same idea in someone else. That is unacceptable.
Take for example Harvard University, once a great establishment. They now steal ideas and claim them for themselves. Suppose the idea for Facebook were discussed on an open channel with a Harvard graduate who respected the rights of the creator, but at the same time, the open channel was being eavesdropped by another more recent Harvard graduate who subsequently induced the idea in students at Harvard University. Since none of the Harvard associates were the creator, they do not have authorship rights and are in violation of international law. Also, since the discussion was on an open channel, the creator can not then be accused of violating confidence.
Interestingly, the real creator can be identified by analysing the original thought and looking for traces of the mind of the creator. Given the quantum no-cloning theorem the original idea can be uniquely identified.
Why does the Likud Party rock backwards and forwards? Because they force themselves to lie that they are the owners of that part of the Kabballah which their ancestors stole from the Phaerohs. The structure of the idea does not match the mind or brain of those people.
