Divine Intervention
March 20, 2011
Pope Benedict XVI recently stated a belief that there is no purgatory. This is an interesting statement. If one follows his encyclicals, I believe that the reader will come to understand that the Pope agrees that there is no reason for child abuse. On that issue, the issue my family, the de Joux and other protestants, left the Catholic Church, we have reached resolution. This does not mean that purgatory, in toto, does not exist.
I used to have a deep dislike of the Catholic Church. I believe that Cardinal Ratzinger, a german, joined the Knights Templar and successfully completed that tight-rope walk to then recant and become Benedict XVI. In that respect, he has check-mated the Benedictines, those mellifluous monks who believe they have the right of divine intervention.
In the spiritual world we all pay for the sins of the father, but through nature, not through the actions of vigilantes who believe, like opus dei, that they are doing the work of god. If those people think that they are acting on the voice of god, they should be assessed by a psychiatric unit. Unfortunately, psychiatry is controlled by disrespectful people. Those very same who believe that they have the right to patronise and control. Life is difficult and there should be an avenue for people to discuss their concerns without stigmatism.
My father was falsely accused to his fiance who left him at the altar. I am now being punished for that alleged sin. What is more disgusting is that I am being punished by those who committed the original sin. Those people contrive these framings to separate soulmates. To keep apart the people in communion with each other, those royals, those yogis and masters, and to control, observe, and influence those who shall eternally be connected to each other, those people will poison with LSD, spread propaganda, and assassinate.
In a strange twist, I was accused of, just after having given my word not to have premarital sex to Pope John Paul II, fornicating with Demarnia Lloyd, a daughter of a freemason and Bavarian Illuminati. There was issue. The actual father was Nick Pavitte, a member of B’nai B’rth, which is controlled by the Mossad. I am being persecuted as the father even though I was being observed locally and by satellite that evening, October 22 2000, and have an alibi.
The most disgusting aspect of Divine Intervention is that there are now freemasons, like the Deputy Director of the New Zealand Security Intelligence Service, who would send german catholics to anally rape the young issue because of the sins of his parents, because his father is a faggot who poisons people with LSD. That is not Divine, that is depravity of the foulest nature.
He does pay for the sins of his father, through his nature and through his environmental and genetic connection to that man. It is our job, as a peaceful society, to protect that young man and foster in him the good nature to which we all work.
Another reason for anal rape exists. To influence control over the victim for whatever reason. That is another symptom of illness. It is a violation of human rights.
The principle of non-interference dictates that all our actions are non-negative. We can not intercede or manipulate to ‘teach lessons,’ we can only prevent others from wanton assault caused by the concealed and manipulative evil that, until we have rooted it from existence, continues to plague our existence.
That evil is manifest is those, like the illuminati and mossad, who believe that the entire world should choose sides in their petty disagreement. They treat those people as pawns to be sent to the slaughter. What is most evil is that there is usually one individual directing both sides.
That young issue is now karmically and astrally connected to his parents, each a pawn in the war we refuse to join. As such he can become a force for good and peace by not bowing to the malice generated by both sides, the fire of lucifer, or the inconsistency of god.
Here is an opportunity for a good form of freemasonry. With that young man’s consent and cooperation, his community can protect him from his genetic and other tendencies. But he must be treated respectfully and there must be no assault on his personal sovereignty. His environment must not be manipulated, there must be no waste of resources, and there must be no insidious suggestions.
Perhaps then he, as Dawkins suggests, can overcome the tyranny of our selfish genes.
