Divine Intervention

March 20, 2011

Pope Benedict XVI recently stated a belief that there is no purgatory. This is an interesting statement. If one follows his encyclicals, I believe that the reader will come to understand that the Pope agrees that there is no reason for child abuse. On that issue, the issue my family, the de Joux and other protestants, left the Catholic Church, we have reached resolution. This does not mean that purgatory, in toto, does not exist.

I used to have a deep dislike of the Catholic Church. I believe that Cardinal Ratzinger, a german, joined the Knights Templar and successfully completed that tight-rope walk to then recant and become Benedict XVI. In that respect, he has check-mated the Benedictines, those mellifluous monks who believe they have the right of divine intervention.

In the spiritual world we all pay for the sins of the father, but through nature, not through the actions of vigilantes who believe, like opus dei, that they are doing the work of god. If those people think that they are acting on the voice of god, they should be assessed by a psychiatric unit. Unfortunately, psychiatry is controlled by disrespectful people. Those very same who believe that they have the right to patronise and control. Life is difficult and there should be an avenue for people to discuss their concerns without stigmatism.

My father was falsely accused to his fiance who left him at the altar. I am now being punished for that alleged sin. What is more disgusting is that I am being punished by those who committed the original sin. Those people contrive these framings to separate soulmates. To keep apart the people in communion with each other, those royals, those yogis and masters, and to control, observe, and influence those who shall eternally be connected to each other, those people will poison with LSD, spread propaganda, and assassinate.

In a strange twist, I was accused of, just after having given my word not to have premarital sex to Pope John Paul II, fornicating with Demarnia Lloyd, a daughter of a freemason and Bavarian Illuminati. There was issue. The actual father was Nick Pavitte, a member of B’nai B’rth, which is controlled by the Mossad. I am being persecuted as the father even though I was being observed locally and by satellite that evening, October 22 2000, and have an alibi.

The most disgusting aspect of Divine Intervention is that there are now freemasons, like the Deputy Director of the New Zealand Security Intelligence Service, who would send german catholics to anally rape the young issue because of the sins of his parents, because his father is a faggot who poisons people with LSD. That is not Divine, that is depravity of the foulest nature.

He does pay for the sins of his father, through his nature and through his environmental and genetic connection to that man. It is our job, as a peaceful society, to protect that young man and foster in him the good nature to which we all work.

Another reason for anal rape exists. To influence control over the victim for whatever reason. That is another symptom of illness. It is a violation of human rights.

The principle of non-interference dictates that all our actions are non-negative. We can not intercede or manipulate to ‘teach lessons,’ we can only prevent others from wanton assault caused by the concealed and manipulative evil that, until we have rooted it from existence, continues to plague our existence.

That evil is manifest is those, like the illuminati and mossad, who believe that the entire world should choose sides in their petty disagreement. They treat those people as pawns to be sent to the slaughter. What is most evil is that there is usually one individual directing both sides.

That young issue is now karmically and astrally connected to his parents, each a pawn in the war we refuse to join. As such he can become a force for good and peace by not bowing to the malice generated by both sides, the fire of lucifer, or the inconsistency of god.

Here is an opportunity for a good form of freemasonry. With that young man’s consent and cooperation, his community can protect him from his genetic and other tendencies. But he must be treated respectfully and there must be no assault on his personal sovereignty. His environment must not be manipulated, there must be no waste of resources, and there must be no insidious suggestions.

Perhaps then he, as Dawkins suggests, can overcome the tyranny of our selfish genes.

I prefer that the nation of New Zealand occupy the natural geographic boundary of these particular islands in the South Pacific.  However, given the nature of colonial arrogance, perhaps different Maori tribes should be handed back the reins of their own destiny, including the Tuhoe.  The current situation is that the status quo in New Zealand sees select white political parties selecting judges for political reasons, benefiting from the graft and corruption in the New Zealand Police, who write court submissions not from a memory of the incident but a series of legal ratios required to substantiate the claims they make, and modify the political and economic situation for their and their cronies own ends.

The Maori are peoples descended from unbroken lineages of proud warriors who have maintained personal sovereignty.  They, the white bourgois, say that no man is an island.  Well I disagree.  The Maori tribes, and also organised gangs, provide a means for the young of their group to maintain pride and self-determination through to adulthood.  The white man suffers the need for a totalising unity and uses underhanded and duplicitous means, whereas each young man or woman who has protected their own self and maintained dignity through self expression, can be considered a self-supporting thread of identity and existence.

Until a form of government and justice arises that respects this innate dignity of the Maori, until no longer necessary, the current hegemony must acquiesce to the particular demands and desires of tribes such as the Tuhoe.  To hold that secession is illegal is symptomatic of an ideology that puts itself, recall Nietzche’s ubermensche and the Nazi atrocities, above others.

Postmodernism has signalled the end of the grand narrative, such as the theology of a single, omniscient God or the totalising nature of the concept of humanity.  Now there is an emphasis on the individual threads and relations of personal narratives.  When the current hegemony recognises the differences and similarities of different peoples, allows for differences in value systems and behavioural norms and supports the similarities of rights to personal sovereignty and respect, when there is a pluralist compatability of norms, then perhaps individual tribes such as the Tuhoe would not have to insist on secession.

A confederate system would allow such independence while allowing for the advantages of cooperation which often follow the contours of the land.

Pork and Puha

September 27, 2009

On July 5th or 6th, 2000, I ordered a Mac’s Gold at the Toot ‘n’ Whistle in Picton.

In New Zealand there is facility to put the goverment under interim administration.  When a hegemonic goverment is prorogued, unconstitutional, and self-serving there must be a mechanism to restore the interest of society.

In Fiji, the sweet sun-ripened vegetarians placed by a Victorian government began to violate the native rights of the settled inhabitants of those islands – a precursor to events in New Zealand where the problem is the police.  George Speight had a right to state his case.  Now there has been a military coup in Fiji.

Ask Ron Marks about the men who looked like the statue called Iwo Jima outside the Beehive and to whom he pointed them out.

Perhaps Fiji is being barred from contributing to the spread of peace in the world because Helen Clark, now at the United Nations in New York, is one of those minions of the germanic, vandalising Victorian adherents of Nietzche and Weishaupt.  They, like their arch-nemesis brothers, divide the world into black and white and expect all to conform to their pyramidic satrapy.

The anti-pope Benedict XVI, heretic and sinister wretch, attempts to perpetrate evil indications and divine intervention under the surface of words of love and life.  His order is corrupt and through action and inaction prevents the achievement of healthy and enjoyable life for a large proportion of the world.  His sick mentality extends to microwaving members of Clan Chattan.

Rugby

June 27, 2009

Given the nature of quantum mechanics, how does a puny geek seal a point?

How would one prevent the impossible?

Purely positive republics.      15 July 2009

Revolving-door merit

June 15, 2009

Membership of aristocracy is governed by non-negative elevation.

Given a committee as a possible internal mechanism for analysis and resolution, that committee must still have a single organic interface to other entities.

For example, the President of the United States might have a cabinet meeting, but when the president speaks to China at the highest level, the dialogue between the President and China is an interpersonal interaction that becomes recorded as the official conversation between those two nations.

The President changes, but the historical record does not. The president is not the United States, but must still act with full responsibility for the previous conversations and actions of his country.

China should not and does not expect to have to speak to each cabinet member about the same topic or about different aspects of the same topic. Each cabinet member brings a different aspect to bear, and, just as with the kaumatua, the president takes all into consideration to act and phrase the president’s behaviour, statements, and responses.

The Hexagon

May 24, 2009

A neomodern structure with a central courtyard, a number of concentric hubs and apparently random connecting hallways housing representatives of China, Japan, Fiji, Scotland, England, and Russia.

Surrounding the hexagon is a tent city and collection of food halls open only to employees from twelve other countries: Indonesia, Ireland, Sweden, Thailand, Australia, Mexico, Canada, Iran, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Holland, and Denmark.

[too many friendly firing incidents to be interoperable with my friends the United States.]

The head of the collective bargains for the members to be able to choose between three or four weetbix for breakfast in red bowls.

The cooperative allows a specialist member to stock the breakfast cereals so that other members may choose.

While driving, all members of the collective must turn the same direction at the same time.

Persons: n., pl. identical members of a collective.

People: n., pl. unique members of a cooperative.

Religion, or more recently, morality is nothing more than a set of norms enforced on inhabitants to limit behaviour. The social contract of Rousseau and Locke has the safety and security of person and property as the core and the benefits of specialisation and cooperation as the bonus.

I accept no unfounded morality. However, once we, in society, have agreed upon some social compact, then we have arrived at contingent morality. Not to say that I would allow rape or abuse. In the wild that wrong would not be repeated by the same person. In society, however, we develop sets of identifying and acceptable behavioural patterns. Do not tell me how to behave except in public or in a situation which grossly affects the public. Although I hold to the principle, the notion of preference frustration is a good guage of the effects of one’s actions.

A paper on the Philosophy of the Natural Sciences in 1997 with Dr. Nick Agar gave me the opportunity to write about the naturalistic fallacy and the ethics of gene therapy.

I have a great problem with the categorical imperative. While all individuals must be treated as being of equal worth, there are those individuals with greater ability who fill positions of greater responsibility and, so one would hope, privilege. There might be seven generals, one in a situation to make a decision. The environment of that situation requires attention and detail, more so than the bed and footlocker in the barracks. But when at home or at a restaurant, the general and the private are equal.

Counter-intelligence codes are an oxymoron nothing like military intelligence.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.